🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about that comments made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Instead, he invoked the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz said in press after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the world in succession. He is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person sensibly had the lack of American champions on the brain?

The American star's second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and concussive strength on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has witnessed the curious emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task too little.

The American star made a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He extended the contest twice on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, only a consequence of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding almost everyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for America failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” the American informed a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is in fact extremely unlikely for everybody else. {